Cross‑border restructuring offers a way to de‑risk supply chains, sidestep punitive tariffs, and build operational resilience without abandoning China entirely. It is not just moving factories from China to Vietnam or Indonesia. It requires a strategic overhaul of tax structures, legal entities, workforce plans, intellectual property arrangements, supplier networks, and leadership models. When done well, it shifts China’s role from a one‑dimensional manufacturing base to a high‑value node in a broader regional strategy.

Why companies are choosing restructuring

Over recent years, geopolitical tensions, especially US–China trade and export controls, have disrupted once‑stable global supply chains. Rising costs and regulatory complexity in China have meant many multinationals are reassessing their entire China footprint. Yet for most, exiting China is simply impractical: the supply‑chain ecosystem is highly specialised; infrastructure is world‑class; R&D capability remains strong; and the domestic market continues to grow.

Instead, cross‑border restructuring provides a more balanced path. Companies can reduce geopolitical exposure while retaining China’s strengths by shifting certain parts of production, typically low‑value or labour‑intensive activities, to ASEAN or South Asia, while keeping R&D, quality control or domestic sales operations in China.

What to keep in China and why

The first step is understanding which parts of the operation truly belong in China. For some businesses, China is an export hub. For others, it’s a domestic market centre, an innovation base or a quality control node. That functional mapping is essential. Labour‑intensive assembly might be moved offshore, but high‑value engineering, regulatory liaison or customer service may remain.

Downsizing China operations isn’t simple. Legal obligations under labour laws mean consultations, severance and possibly union involvement. Equipment sales or asset transfer may require local approvals, particularly in sensitive sectors. And shifting assets can trigger tax liabilities, companies must weigh exit costs against long‑term benefits carefully.

Sensitive relationships can suffer if the process isn’t handled transparently. Government incentives or supplier ties may be put at risk if local stakeholders feel blindsided. Clear communication and compliance are crucial to preserving goodwill.

Choosing a new host location with purpose

The decision of where to locate new operations goes far beyond low labour cost. Strategic choice today must consider trade agreements, regulatory alignment, infrastructure, talent pools, and industry‑specific incentives.

For example, moving final assembly to Vietnam or Malaysia can help firms meet rules‑of‑origin requirements for free trade agreements, qualifying goods for tariff‑free export to the EU or US. But achieving this advantage depends on genuine manufacturing value‑add, not merely repackaging.

Market access also matters: Indonesia may suit consumer‑goods businesses seeking scale, while Singapore could be preferable for regulated sectors needing compliance clarity. Infrastructure readiness varies, from ports to digital readiness, and needs to match sectoral demands.

Many emerging markets now offer sector‑targeted incentives, India’s PLI (Production‑Linked Incentive) for electronics, or Thailand’s R&D grants for biotech. It’s vital to assess these offers relative to specific company needs.

Structuring the new entity and planning the timeline

How new operations are structured affects control, regulatory exposure, and cost. Options include a wholly foreign‑owned enterprise (WFOE), joint venture, contract manufacturing agreement or strategic alliance – all with different implications for tariff control, governance and local compliance.

To qualify for tariff benefits under agreements like RCEP or CPTPP, companies need to ensure local transformation thresholds are met, not just shipment points moved. That shapes decisions around what functions to relocate and what suppliers to localise.

A phased rollout is often wiser than a big‑bang relocation. Pilot operations allow evaluation of delivery performance, compliance fit, quality standards and cost savings before full-scale implementation. Project timelines must reflect construction, licensing, recruitment, training and partner onboarding timeframes.

Tax, transfer pricing and fiscal design

Restructuring often reshapes where value is created, and that impacts tax. Multinationals must ensure operations reflect substance: functions, risks and assets must align with where profits are allocated to avoid transfer pricing disputes across jurisdictions.

China is increasingly vigilant about outbound restructuring, especially where high‑value functions or IP are shifted. Early engagement with local tax bureaus and careful planning of asset transfers, or equity restructuring, is key to managing capital gains exposure and compliance risk.

Transfer pricing models must be updated to reflect new functional roles. Suppose China becomes a limited‑risk distributor rather than the main manufacturer. Then profit allocation and intercompany pricing must align with legal reality, not just historic structure.

People, leadership and morale

The human side of restructuring is often underestimated. Talent is hard to replace, and morale can suffer if staff in China feel abandoned or insecure. Leadership continuity, internal communications, retention plans, or even relocation programmes, must be carefully managed.

Mobilising key personnel from China to the new site raises immigration, tax and cultural adaptation issues. Host countries may limit work permits or raise residency hurdles. Companies need clear plans and legal advice on visas, taxation and support for expat staff.

At the same time, building a skilled local workforce requires labour‑market mapping, training initiatives, localisation planning and collaboration with vocational schools or employment agencies.

Protecting intellectual property and data

Moving operations can expose IP and data to new risks. Protection regimes vary by jurisdiction, patent law enforcement, judicial capacity and digital data governance differ greatly. IP risk assessments should be specific to each location and business model.

Companies must decide whether to hold IP in China, in a regional headquarters, or a neutral jurisdiction, understanding the impacts on tax, licensing arrangements and exit liabilities. Licensing terms between entities need to be clear, reflecting royalty terms, legal risks, and control frameworks.

If operations shift to territories with weaker IP regimes, greater vigilance, not just contracts, is required. Partner vetting, in‑house retention of core know‑how and regional IP strategies help limit leakage.

Managing supplier and customer relationships through transition

Supply change disruption is a real danger. Long‑standing supplier ties and delivery expectations can be upended if operations move too quickly. Identifying sole‑source vulnerabilities or critical clients is essential before the transition begins.

Maintaining customer service levels during the shift requires interim logistics planning, buffer stock, possible dual sourcing and renegotiation of contracts to reflect new transit routes or import/export jurisdictions.

Proactive, transparent communication builds trust. Customers and suppliers benefit from clear timelines and commitment to quality. In some cases, joint planning with anchor suppliers or logistics partners can smooth the transition; others may mean onboarding new local sourcing partners in the host country.

When is restructuring the right move?

Cross‑border restructuring may sound complex, but it offers more than risk mitigation. For many companies, it is a strategic move designed to future‑proof operations in a world where agility and resilience matter as much as efficiency.

Businesses must assess their own vulnerabilities: Are specific tariff risks or export controls exposing particular product lines? Is there over‑reliance on a single site or region? Which functions are portable? Which need to stay in China? Will a partnership model or contract manufacturing serve just as well as full investment offshore?

Cost savings alone are rarely enough. Firms must weigh infrastructure limitations, legal unknowns, language or cultural barriers, and balance must favour long‑term operational stability over sheer low cost.

Finally, internal alignment is critical. Leadership must treat restructuring as organisational change, not just logistics: reshaping workflows, managing talent, and preserving morale during the shift, all while sustaining governance, communication and the integrity of service delivery.

The post What is cross-border restructuring? appeared first on Focus - China Britain Business Council.

China’s semiconductor sector has emerged as a cornerstone of its technological ambition, propelled by significant government investment and a strategic push for self-sufficiency. In 2024, the industry was valued at £134.2 billion, with projections indicating a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.8% from 2025 to 2034, potentially reaching £283.7 billion by 2034. This growth reflects China’s determination to reduce reliance on foreign chips, which accounted for 83% of its £185.5 billion chip consumption in 2020, and to establish itself as a global leader in semiconductor innovation. The sector’s rapid development, driven by advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), 5G, and electric vehicles (EVs), positions China at the forefront of the global tech race, though geopolitical tensions and technological gaps present significant challenges.

China’s semiconductor industry began in earnest during the 1980s, with early efforts like Project 908 and Project 909 aimed at building domestic capabilities. These initiatives, including partnerships with foreign firms like NEC, faced setbacks due to outdated technologies and global market downturns. A pivotal shift occurred in 2014 with the National Integrated Circuit (IC) Industry Investment Fund, or “Big Fund,” which injected £17.6 billion initially, followed by £23.3 billion in 2019 and £36.8 billion in 2023. The “Made in China 2025” strategy set ambitious targets of 40% self-sufficiency by 2020 and 70% by 2025, though the actual figure reached only 30% by 2025, underscoring the complexity of achieving technological autonomy. Despite this, China’s 53.7% share of global chip consumption in 2020 highlights its position as the world’s largest semiconductor market.

Key players dominate China’s semiconductor landscape. Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC), the country’s largest foundry, reported £9.77 billion in revenue in Q1 2024, a 19.7% year-on-year increase, making it the world’s second-largest pure-play foundry behind Taiwan’s TSMC. SMIC’s production of 7-nanometer chips, such as the Kirin 9000S for Huawei’s Mate 60 Pro, demonstrates its ability to innovate despite U.S. export controls. “SMIC is at most only a few years behind Intel and Samsung,” noted industry analyst Dylan Patel, highlighting its progress in advanced node manufacturing. Hua Hong Semiconductor, the second-largest Chinese chipmaker, holds a 2.6% global market share, focusing on mature node chips. HiSilicon, a Huawei subsidiary, designs advanced chips like the Kirin series, while Yangtze Memory Technologies Corporation (YMTC) has achieved a 5% global market share in NAND flash memory, with plans to surpass 10% by 2027. Other notable firms include Hygon Information Technology, producing x86-based CPUs, and Loongson Technology, developing MIPS-compatible microprocessors for domestic applications.

Opportunities for partnerships are abundant, particularly in mature node manufacturing and emerging technologies. China’s dominance in EVs, with 35 million vehicles projected for 2025, drives demand for power management and sensor chips, creating openings for collaboration with foreign firms. For instance, joint ventures like Vanguard International Semiconductor’s partnership with NXP to form VisionPower Semiconductor Manufacturing Company in Singapore highlight the potential for cross-border cooperation. The rise of 5G, with China projected to have 430 million users by 2025, further fuels demand for advanced chips, offering opportunities for firms specialising in AI and IoT applications. China’s focus on RISC-V architecture, supported by companies like Alibaba’s T-Head, presents a pathway for partnerships in open-source chip design, reducing reliance on Western intellectual property like Arm.

However, the sector faces significant risks. U.S.-led export controls, tightened in October 2023, restrict access to advanced lithography equipment, particularly extreme ultraviolet (EUV) machines critical for sub-5nm chips. ASML, a Dutch firm with a monopoly on EUV technology, remains a chokepoint, as noted by the Federal Reserve: “A single Dutch company, ASML, has 100% market share for the most advanced lithography machines.” China’s Shanghai Micro Electronics Equipment (SMEE) has developed a 28nm lithography machine, but closing the gap to 5nm or below remains a challenge. Geopolitical tensions, including U.S. tariffs and sanctions on firms like Huawei, exacerbate supply chain vulnerabilities. “U.S. trade restrictions on China can hamper its global position as a manufacturing hub,” warned Fortune Business Insights. Overcapacity in legacy chips, driven by aggressive subsidies, risks price wars that could destabilise global markets. Additionally, a talent shortage and high capital costs (SMIC’s 2023 budget rose 18% to £5.82 billion) pose internal challenges.

Growth projections remain optimistic despite these hurdles. The global semiconductor market is expected to grow at a 15% CAGR from 2025 to 2030, reaching £777.7 billion by 2030, with China’s share projected to increase significantly. The memory segment, led by firms like YMTC, is anticipated to surge by 24% in 2025, driven by high-bandwidth memory (HBM) for AI applications. China’s focus on mature nodes (28nm and above), which account for 40% of the global market by 2030, aligns with its strengths in automotive and industrial applications. “Chinese foundry players are performing well in 2024, with a high utilisation rate of around 87% expected in 2025, thanks to the ‘Design by China + Manufacturing in China’ policy,” stated a Wikipedia analysis. Investments in 110 new fab projects since 2014, totalling £151.9 billion, underscore China’s commitment to expanding capacity, with 40 fabs operational and 38 under construction.

The integration of AI and 5G technologies is a key driver of growth. China’s leadership in 5G, with over one million base stations and 80% year-on-year growth in 5G smartphone shipments in 2021, creates a robust domestic market for semiconductors. The automotive sector, particularly EVs and autonomous driving, demands sophisticated chips for battery management and sensors, further boosting demand. “The semiconductor supply chain, spanning design, manufacturing, testing, and advanced packaging, will create a new wave of growth opportunities,” said Galen Zeng, Senior Research Manager at IDC Asia/Pacific. However, the industry’s reliance on government subsidies, estimated at £116.3 billion over the past decade, raises concerns about sustainability and market distortions, as noted by the Semiconductor Industry Association.

China’s semiconductor sector stands at a crossroads, balancing remarkable progress with formidable challenges. Breakthroughs like SMIC’s 7nm chips and YMTC’s 200+ layer NAND flash demonstrate innovation, yet the lack of EUV technology and geopolitical headwinds limit cutting-edge advancements. “It is entirely possible that five or ten years from now there is a far more developed indigenous ecosystem for Chinese chip equipment suppliers,” suggested Feldgoise in a CKGSB Knowledge article, pointing to long-term potential. As China continues to invest heavily and foster partnerships, its semiconductor industry is poised to reshape global supply chains, offering both opportunities and risks for international stakeholders.

The post China’s Semiconductor Sector appeared first on Focus - China Britain Business Council.

Tianjin: A Northern Powerhouse

Nestled in northeast China, Tianjin is one of China’s four municipalities, enjoying provincial-level status alongside Beijing, Shanghai, and Chongqing. With a population of nearly 14 million, it is a bustling centre for international trade, particularly renowned for its port, which handled imports and exports worth £210 billion in 2023, more than four times the value processed by the UK’s Port of Felixstowe (£47 billion in 2024). Tianjin’s strategic location and robust infrastructure make it a vital cog in China’s economic machine, offering UK businesses a gateway to northern China and beyond.

The Tianjin Free Trade Zone: Structure and Ambition

The TJFTZ, one of China’s earliest free trade zones alongside Fujian and Guangdong, spans 119.9 square kilometres across three sub-zones: the Tianjin Airport Area, the Harbour Area, and the Seaport Area (encompassing the Binhai CBD). Despite occupying just 1% of Tianjin’s land, the zone punches above its weight, contributing 26% of the city’s new foreign-invested enterprises, 38% of its import and export volume, and 43% of its foreign capital, according to Vice-Mayor Li Wenhai in April 2025.

The TJFTZ is strategically positioned to drive the Jing-Jin-Ji (Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei) region’s integration into the global economy. It serves as a testing ground for bold trade and investment policies, offering UK firms a unique opportunity to tap into China’s liberalising market. Its mission is to become a “high-level platform for opening up to the world,” with a focus on innovation, trade facilitation, and international collaboration.

Sector-Specific Opportunities for UK Businesses

Each sub-zone of the TJFTZ caters to distinct industries, presenting tailored opportunities for British companies:

• Tianjin Airport Area: Specialising in civil aviation, equipment manufacturing, R&D, digital information, biomedicine, and aircraft leasing, this area is a natural fit for UK firms in aerospace and life sciences.
• Harbour Area: Focused on international shipping and logistics, this sub-zone aligns with the UK’s expertise in maritime services. B
• Seaport Area (Binhai CBD): A hub for finance, open banking, cross-border e-commerce, and creative industries, this area is particularly attractive for UK fintech and media firms.

Policy Incentives: A Magnet for Investment

The TJFTZ offers a suite of policies designed to attract foreign investment, many of which are particularly appealing to UK businesses:

• Investment Liberalisation: The China FTZ Negative List allows foreign investors to operate in non-restricted sectors with minimal red tape. Business registration takes just three days, and planning approvals are processed within seven days, enabling swift market entry for UK firms.
• Pioneering Data Export Rules: In 2024, the TJFTZ introduced China’s first data export negative list, simplifying cross-border data transfers. This is a boon for UK tech and e-commerce companies navigating China’s complex data regulations.
• Tax Breaks: Companies in priority sectors like R&D, advanced manufacturing, and civil aviation enjoy corporate income tax rates of 9–15%, compared to China’s standard 25%. This could significantly boost profitability for UK businesses in these fields.
• Trade and Logistics Facilitation: Goods within the TJFTZ are exempt from import/export licences (unless otherwise specified), and processing, storage, and re-export activities benefit from tax exemptions. Unlimited storage periods and duty-free re-exports further enhance cost efficiencies.
• Financial Incentives: The absence of currency exchange fees and streamlined international payment procedures make cross-border transactions seamless. Faster VAT refunds post-export add to the zone’s appeal.
• International Trade Agreements: The TJFTZ actively leverages agreements like RCEP, CPTPP, and DEPA. In 2023, Tianjin enterprises saw £1.4 billion in RCEP-related trade, with a 79% year-on-year increase, offering UK firms a foothold in these lucrative frameworks.

Economic Performance: A Steady Ascent

While comprehensive GDP and FDI data for the TJFTZ are not fully public, available metrics highlight its resilience. The zone’s foreign trade value has remained stable at £27 billion annually (2019–2023), with foreign capital utilisation rising from an average of £3.7 billion (2018–2020) to £4.6 billion (2021–2023). The Binhai CBD posted a 5.5% GDP growth in 2024, outpacing China’s national average. The number of registered businesses has soared from 69,000 in 2020 to nearly 90,000 in 2025, underscoring the zone’s growing appeal.

Future Prospects and UK Relevance

The TJFTZ is poised for further growth, with initiatives like a new e-commerce returns storage centre to cut return times from 11 to 5 days and £5.1 billion in funding for 107 new projects launched in April 2024. These developments signal a commitment to enhancing the zone’s business environment, particularly for e-commerce and tech firms, sectors where the UK excels.

For British businesses, the TJFTZ offers a strategic entry point into China’s northern market, bolstered by its proximity to Beijing and integration with global trade networks. The zone’s focus on open banking and cross-border e-commerce aligns with the UK’s strengths in financial services and digital trade. Moreover, its liberalised policies and tax incentives provide a competitive edge for UK SMEs and multinationals alike.

The Tianjin Free Trade Zone is more than a shipping hub; it’s a dynamic platform for UK businesses to engage with China’s economic powerhouse. From tax breaks and streamlined regulations to pioneering data policies, the TJFTZ offers a wealth of opportunities for British firms in aviation, finance, logistics, and beyond. As the zone continues to innovate and expand, UK companies looking to break into or grow within the Chinese market would be wise to explore its potential. For further guidance on navigating the TJFTZ, the China-Britain Business Council offers tailored support to help British firms seize these opportunities.

The post Tianjin Free Trade Zone: A Gateway for UK Businesses in Northern China appeared first on Focus - China Britain Business Council.

One of the most pressing issues for UK companies is the variability in quality standards across China’s diverse manufacturing landscape. With thousands of factories ranging from cutting-edge facilities to smaller, less experienced operations, the risk of receiving subpar products is real. Inconsistencies can occur, particularly in smaller or less experienced operations, often due to the use of cheaper materials or inadequate workmanship. This can spell trouble for UK firms, whose customers expect products that meet rigorous British and European standards. To counter this, thorough supplier vetting is essential. Regular audits, supported by third-party inspection firms, ensure suppliers maintain consistent quality, fostering long-term partnerships built on trust.

Communication barriers further complicate quality control. Language differences and cultural nuances can lead to misaligned expectations, resulting in products that miss the mark. Miscommunication can lead to incorrect specifications, production errors, and ultimately, defective products. This means investing in clear, detailed communication channels. Hiring bilingual project managers or working through intermediaries that can offer translation and cultural advisory services can help bridge the gap. Detailed contracts and quality control checklists also help align expectations, ensuring that specifications are met precisely. By establishing robust communication from the outset, UK firms can reduce the risk of costly errors and maintain product integrity.

Scaling production in China often amplifies quality issues, especially in high-volume runs where small defects can snowball into significant problems. Problems that might be negligible in small batches can become significant when producing large quantities. This is particularly critical for UK companies importing goods into the EU, where regulations like the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation, and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) demand strict compliance. Adopting advanced technologies, such as AI-driven inspection systems, can help. Advances in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and automation are enabling manufacturers to improve the accuracy and efficiency of quality control processes. UK firms can encourage Chinese suppliers to integrate these technologies, drawing inspiration from global players like Siemens, which have successfully implemented smart manufacturing solutions in China. Consultancies can also guide businesses in embedding these tools into their supply chains, reducing rework and ensuring consistency at scale.

Regulatory compliance adds another layer of complexity. China’s “Made in China 2025” initiative pushes for higher quality and innovation, but aligning with UK and EU standards, such as those governing product safety and traceability, remains challenging. The need for UK manufacturers importing to the EU to appoint a ‘responsible person’ to ensure compliance is a sensible requirement but adds both cost and operational burden. This is especially relevant for goods entering Northern Ireland, which adheres to EU single market rules. To navigate this, UK businesses can turn to legal experts who specialise in international compliance or leverage CBBC’s regulatory advisory services to stay abreast of China’s evolving policies. Clear labelling and documentation, aligned with both Chinese and international standards, help ensure products meet market requirements and avoid costly rejections.

Labour shortages in China’s manufacturing sector also pose a threat to quality. In 2023 a report claimed that 67% of companies struggle to find skilled workers, which can lead to production errors. For UK firms, this underscores the need to verify that suppliers have access to trained staff. Collaborating with manufacturers to implement training programmes, can address skill gaps. CBBC’s network can connect UK businesses with industry clusters in China, where specialised sectors benefit from concentrated expertise, ensuring a more skilled workforce and higher-quality output.

Rising costs and supply chain disruptions further complicate the picture. With Shanghai’s minimum wage at 2,690 RMB per month as of January 2025 and manufacturing wages outpacing those in countries like Vietnam, some suppliers may cut corners to manage costs, risking quality. Geopolitical tensions, such as US-China trade tariffs, also create bottlenecks that disrupt production schedules. AI-driven predictive analytics can enhance supply chain visibility, helping firms anticipate and address disruptions before they impact quality.

The post How to ensure Quality Control in Chinese Manufacturing appeared first on Focus - China Britain Business Council.

Announced on 4 April 2025, China’s move to restrict rare earths came as a direct counter to US President Donald Trump’s latest tariffs, unveiled just days earlier, which slapped a 50% levy on Chinese imports. Beijing’s response targets samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium, minerals essential for high-tech manufacturing, from electric vehicle (EV) batteries to military hardware. For British businesses, deeply entwined in these global networks, the implications are immediate and far-reaching, raising questions about supply security and strategic adaptation in an increasingly volatile world.

The export restrictions don’t constitute an outright ban but introduce a licensing system, a mechanism likely to prioritise China’s domestic needs and allies over Western rivals. Reporting on the announcement, The Wire China described it as “a sweeping response” designed to “squeeze supply to the West of minerals used to make weapons, electronics, and a range of consumer goods.” Noah Berman, writing for The Wire, framed it as a calculated “tit-for-tat escalation,” reflecting Beijing’s frustration with Trump’s aggressive trade policies. The timing aligns with a broader pattern of retaliation – China has flexed its rare earth muscle before, notably in 2019 when President Xi Jinping toured a magnet factory amid an earlier US-China trade spat. Now, with Trump back in the White House and tariffs reinstated, Beijing is doubling down, leveraging its near-monopoly on these critical resources.

China produces around 90% of the world’s rare earths, a group of 17 elements that underpin modern technology. The seven targeted in this latest move are particularly vital – dysprosium and terbium power high-performance magnets in EVs and wind turbines, while scandium strengthens aerospace alloys. Mark A. Smith, CEO of NioCorp Developments, called it “a precision strike by China against Pentagon supply chains,” a sentiment that resonates beyond the US to NATO allies like Britain. The UK, with no domestic rare earth mines, relies heavily on imports, often processed through China’s vast refining network. Defence giants like BAE Systems depend on these materials for fighter jets and missiles, while the EV sector – think Jaguar Land Rover’s ambitious electrification goals – faces potential cost spikes and delays as supply tightens.

Since the initial announcement, further developments have sharpened the picture. Bloomberg reported on 7 April 2025 that China’s curbs “threaten to disrupt the global supply of key materials used widely in high-tech manufacturing,” with analysts forecasting an 18% rise in battery costs by 2026 if alternative sources aren’t secured. This echoes concerns around China’s Made in China 2025 strategy, which aims to dominate high-tech industries globally. Adding fuel to the fire, a massive, million-tonne rare earth deposit was uncovered in China in March 2025, according to mining.com, bolstering Beijing’s confidence in its resource leverage. For British firms, already grappling with post-Brexit trade complexities, this is a stark reminder of their exposure.

The UK imported £1.2 billion in rare earth-dependent goods in 2024, from smartphone components to renewable energy tech, much of it tracing back to Chinese processing. SMEs in particular lack the scale to pivot quickly, risking disruptions if licenses favour China’s domestic players or friendly nations like Russia. Yet amid the threat lies opportunity. The EU, which sources 98% of its rare earths from China, is racing to “reshore” supply chains – a blueprint Britain could follow. Pensana’s rare earth processing hub in Saltend, Yorkshire, backed by government grants, offers a glimmer of hope, though full-scale production is years away. Meanwhile, Australia’s Lynas Rare Earths, a rare non-Chinese supplier, is expanding its Texas facility with US support, a project the UK could tap into via trade deals. Japan provides another model – since 2020, it has slashed its China dependency to below 50% through diversification and recycling, a strategy British firms might emulate.

This isn’t just about economics; it’s geopolitical chess. China’s move signals displeasure with the US and tests Western resolve. For the UK, balancing relations with Beijing and Washington is tricky – post-Brexit trade talks with China remain sensitive, yet siding too closely with Trump’s tariffs could invite reprisals. Analysts see cracks in China’s dominance, however. A March 2025 study from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, cited by the South China Morning Post, predicts that Africa, South America and Australia could challenge China’s edge within a decade. Reuters noted that rising investment in Greenland’s rare earth deposits could shift the balance, with Canadian and British firms already eyeing stakes. For now, though, Beijing holds the reins – and isn’t shy about pulling them.

The fallout is already stirring debate. Increases in global rare earth prices, which will push up the cost of things like EV components, are likely to hit British SMEs hardest, urging them to audit suppliers and lock in contracts with non-Chinese sources where possible. Larger firms might press Westminster for tax breaks or R&D funding to bolster domestic capabilities, a call echoed by the UK’s Critical Minerals Strategy, launched in 2022 but yet to fully prioritise rare earths alongside lithium and cobalt.

Looking ahead, Britain must act decisively. Partnerships with resource-rich allies like Canada and Greenland could diversify supply, while joint ventures with Lynas or Japan’s Dowa Holdings might bridge the gap. The government could accelerate Pensana’s timeline with targeted incentives, mirroring the US’ $1 billion rare earth investment under Trump. For businesses, the message is clear: adapt or risk being sidelined. As the US-China trade war heats up, Britain’s challenge is to navigate the rare earth crosshairs with agility and foresight.

This isn’t a one-off skirmish but a wake-up call. These latest controls expose the fragility of global supply chains and threaten further destabilisation if tensions persist. For British industry, the stakes are high: defence, green tech and economic competitiveness hang in the balance. The UK must chart a path that safeguards its interests while seizing the opportunities this upheaval presents.

The post China’s rare earths retaliation: A strategic move with global implications amid Trump’s trade war appeared first on Focus - China Britain Business Council.

Over the last 10 years, the growth in China’s robotics industry has been nothing short of staggering. Back in 2013, China accounted for just 14% of global industrial robot installations, according to the International Federation of Robotics (IFR). Fast forward to 2022, and that figure had soared to 52%, with 290,144 units installed in a single year. By 2023, China’s robot density – robots per 10,000 manufacturing workers – hit 470, overtaking Germany (429) and Japan (419), and trailing only South Korea and Singapore. This leap reflects a decade of aggressive government policies, like the “Made in China 2025” initiative and the 14th Five-Year Plan, which earmarked robotics as a cornerstone of industrial innovation.

The value of this sector is equally impressive. In 2021, the Chinese Institute of Electronics pegged the robotics industry at 83.9 billion yuan (£9.2 billion), split between industrial robots (44.6 billion yuan) and service robots (39.3 billion yuan). By 2022, revenue climbed to 170 billion yuan (£18.6 billion), and forecasts suggest a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 20% through 2025. Today, the market size is estimated at around £6.6 billion, with projections pointing to £375 billion globally by 2035, where China will undoubtedly claim a hefty slice. The benefits are manifold: robots boost productivity, slashing labour costs amid a shrinking workforce – China’s working-age population is expected to drop from 998 million in 2014 to 800 million by 2050. They also tackle the “four D’s” – dirty, dangerous, dull, and dedicated tasks – freeing humans for higher-value work while driving efficiency in industries like automotive and electronics.

Leading the charge are homegrown giants like Inovance, often dubbed “Little Huawei” for its ex-Huawei engineering roots. Inovance has carved out a niche in industrial automation and electric vehicle motors, capturing a growing share of a market once dominated by foreign firms. Then there’s Siasun, a pioneer in AI-powered robotics, and Ubtech, a Shenzhen-based firm excelling in humanoid robots and education tech. Double Ring Transmission (Shuanghuan Chuandong) is another standout, challenging Japan’s dominance in precision components like RV reducers, where it holds a 14% share. These companies reflect a shift: Chinese firms now account for 47% of the domestic market, up from 28% a decade ago.

China hasn’t just nurtured its own talent, it’s cast a net abroad. While direct acquisitions of foreign robotics firms are less common due to tightened Western regulations, partnerships and investments abound. Major Western players like ABB (Switzerland), Fanuc (Japan), and Yaskawa (Japan) have poured resources into China, building massive factories in Shanghai and beyond. ABB and Fanuc’s Shanghai plants are among the world’s largest, while Yaskawa’s three factories churn out 18,000 units yearly. These ventures often involve technology transfers, bolstering local expertise. However, China’s appetite for outright ownership has been curbed – think of the EU’s rejection of Amazon’s bid for iRobot, a signal of wariness about Chinese influence.

Geographically, the robotics boom isn’t uniform. The Yangtze River Delta – Shanghai, Kunshan, Nanjing – leads with its industrial base and startup ecosystem. Shenzhen, dubbed China’s Silicon Valley, thrives on electronics and innovation, hosting firms like Ubtech. Guangzhou dominates in automotive robotics, with companies like GAC Group pushing boundaries. Suzhou, with over 600 robotics-related firms generating 130 billion yuan (£14.2 billion) in 2023, is a hub for components and AI integration. Chengdu, meanwhile, is emerging in aerospace and defence robotics, buoyed by government-backed industrial parks.

The ripple effects extend to accompanying industries. Automotive and electronics, China’s manufacturing titans, lean heavily on robots for assembly and precision work. New energy sectors like lithium batteries and photovoltaics saw robot demand surge by 131% and 51%, respectively in 2021. Logistics and warehousing, turbocharged by e-commerce, benefit from AI-driven automation, while healthcare and agriculture are dipping their toes into robotic waters, from surgical bots to planting drones. As Daisy Zhang of Macquarie Group has noted, “The continuous increase in the industrial robot industry chain has lowered the capital threshold for enterprises to carry out automation transportation,” highlighting how this ecosystem fuels broader economic shifts.

Looking ahead, the future is bright – and robotic. China aims to be a global innovation hub by 2025 and a world leader by 2035, per its Five-Year Plan. With over 190,000 robot-related patents (two-thirds of the global total) and breakthroughs in AI, 5G, and IoT, the sector’s poised for exponential growth. Analysts predict 5-10% annual increases in robot stock through 2027, driven by domestic champions and cost advantages. Robert D. Atkinson of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) warns, “It is likely only a matter of time before Chinese robotics companies catch up to the leading edge,” suggesting a seismic shift in global competition.

For British companies, this spells opportunity. China’s need for cutting-edge tech opens doors for collaboration – think software solutions like those from Motus Operandi, or precision engineering expertise. The UK’s strengths in AI and automation could find an eager market, especially in service robotics or niche industrial applications. Yet, challenges loom: navigating joint ventures and government oversight requires savvy. As Martin Kefer of Motus Operandi cautioned, “Avoid relying on government for growth,” urging firms to lean on innovation and agility.

In short, China’s robotics industry is a juggernaut – decades in the making, billions in the bank, and boundless in ambition. For Britain, it’s a chance to ride the wave, if we play our cards right.

The post China’s robotics industry: Ambition, investment, modernisation appeared first on Focus - China Britain Business Council.

In 2025, China’s evolving consumer preferences, policy shifts, and technological advancements will shape opportunities for businesses and investors alike. From the rise of green technologies to the growing appetite for health-conscious products, the country offers lucrative avenues for foreign firms ready to adapt to its unique market dynamics.

However, thriving in China’s competitive environment requires more than just identifying growth areas. Businesses must navigate complex regulatory frameworks, cultural nuances, and a fast-paced digital transformation. By understanding the opportunities and challenges in key sectors, companies can position themselves effectively to succeed in one of the world’s most dynamic markets.

Top industries to watch in 2025

Green energy and renewables: China’s commitment to achieving carbon neutrality by 2060 has accelerated investments in renewable energy sources, including solar, wind, and hydrogen. The government’s supportive policies and substantial funding are creating a fertile environment for innovation and growth in this sector.

Electric vehicles (EVs): As the world’s largest market for electric vehicles, China continues to drive the global EV industry forward. With increasing consumer adoption and government incentives, opportunities abound for companies involved in EV manufacturing, battery technology, and charging infrastructure.

Artificial intelligence (AI): China’s strategic focus on AI development is fostering advancements across various applications, from smart manufacturing to autonomous driving. The integration of AI into business processes is enhancing efficiency and creating new market opportunities.

Healthcare and biotechnology: An ageing population and rising health consciousness are propelling growth in China’s healthcare and biotech sectors. There’s a growing demand for advanced medical devices, pharmaceuticals, and healthcare services, presenting significant opportunities for foreign investors.

Advanced manufacturing: China’s push towards high-tech manufacturing is transforming traditional industries. The adoption of smart factory technologies and automation is enhancing productivity and competitiveness, opening doors for companies specialising in industrial robotics and related technologies.

Navigating challenges in China’s top industries

While these sectors offer promising opportunities, foreign businesses must be prepared to navigate China’s complex regulatory landscape and intense competition from local players. Compliance with evolving laws, such as data protection regulations and sector-specific restrictions, is crucial. Additionally, understanding cultural nuances and consumer behaviour is essential for market success.

China’s strategic focus on green energy, electric vehicles, AI, healthcare, and advanced manufacturing presents lucrative opportunities for foreign businesses and investors in 2025. By staying informed about industry trends and regulatory developments and by adapting to the unique dynamics of the Chinese market, companies can position themselves for success in these burgeoning sectors.

The post What are the top 5 industries to watch in China? appeared first on Focus - China Britain Business Council.

Chinese EV manufacturer BYD posted record sales of electric vehicles (EVs) in 2024, as Elon Musk’s Tesla saw sales slow for the first time in years. BYD reported that it sold 4.3 million EVs and hybrids in 2024, of which 1.76 million were pure EVs. While Tesla narrowly beat BYD across the whole of 2024, delivering 1.79 million pure EVs, BYD’s 2024 Q4 did actually surpass Tesla.

BYD (short for ‘Build Your Dreams’) was founded in 1995 as a rechargeable battery manufacturer. It expanded into automotive after buying a Shaanxi-based car company in 2003, using its battery experience and supply chains to pivot to EV. It is popular for its cheaper models, which range in price from around RMB 70,000 (£7,697) to RMB 200,000 (£21,991). Tesla’s Model 3, on the other hand, starts at RMB 231,900 (£25,499).

Tesla remains the world’s most valuable car maker, driven by its innovative approach, high-performance vehicles and strong branding (thanks, in part, to the inescapable figure of Elon Musk). However, its higher price point has made it less accessible to a broader market segment, an area where BYD has gained a competitive edge.

This edge over other Chinese brands and, increasingly, international brands, has been sharpened by a number of external and internal factors.

Like all Chinese EV companies, BYD has benefitted from extensive Chinese government subsidies over the past few decades. The government has been subsidising producers of EVs for public transport, taxis and the consumer market since 2009. More than RMB 200 billion (£22.14 billion) was spent on EV subsidies and tax breaks in China over the 2009-2022 period. Moreover, EV consumers in China have received purchase subsidies from the government for a number of years. China is expected to sell more EVs (pure EVs and hybrids) than traditional vehicles for the first time in 2025.

China also has a very strong position in the supply chains for the critical materials used to make EV batteries, especially rare earths. At present, China accounts for over 80% of the world’s rare earth processing, and in late 2024, the country banned shipments to the US of several minerals and metals used in semiconductor manufacturing and military applications, including gallium, germanium and antimony, citing national security concerns.

In terms of internal factors, BYD has also benefitted from its background as a battery manufacturer, which has given it a head start in terms of technology and access to materials. By keeping battery production in-house, it can also achieve significant cost savings.

The big threat posed by BYD’s recent success is increased competition for established automotive brands.

Western markets have largely taken a protectionist stance in response to the massive growth of China’s EV sector. In October 2024, tariffs of up to 45.3% on imports of Chinese-made EVs came into force across the EU, while the Biden administration has also imposed a 100% duty on EVs from China, with President-elect Donald Trump expected to impose further tariffs on imports.

Nevertheless, some commentators suggest that BYD and Tesla are so far ahead of the field that traditional automotive manufacturers are already struggling to compete. Indeed, the growth of the two companies is showing that brand recognition or company history are not predictors of success in the EV market. Future growth will come down to things like AI integration and battery technology, rather than just the cars themselves, giving Silicon Valley and fast-moving Chinese companies a leg-up over traditional car manufacturers.

Now the question for BYD will be whether it can translate its current sales figures, most of which are concentrated in the Chinese market, into global success. For Tesla and other EV manufacturers, the rise of BYD serves as a call to innovate in an increasingly competitive market, innovation that could have a positive knock-on effect in other areas. Ultimately, getting more EVs of any brand on the road is an important step towards giving more people more access to sustainable transportation options.

The post How Chinese EV manufacturer BYD overtook Tesla appeared first on Focus - China Britain Business Council.

The move, which prohibits the export to the US of products such as gallium, germanium, antimony, and superhard materials, strengthens China’s existing limits on critical mineral exports and represents a rapid retaliation to the US Commerce Department’s latest round of tech export controls announced on Monday, 4 December 2024.

These export controls, introduced on national security grounds, curtailed the sale of two dozen types of semiconductor-making equipment to China and restricted 140 Chinese companies from accessing American technology.

The measures add to the many existing US tech controls imposed against China in recent years, which have reduced the types of semiconductors that American companies are allowed to sell to China.

In addition to China’s retaliatory controls on strategic materials, the US government’s action also prompted four major Chinese industry associations to advise against using US chips on Tuesday, claiming they are “no longer safe” and advocating for domestic alternatives.

The warning may affect major companies such as Nvidia, AMD, and Intel and was criticised by the Semiconductor Industry Association, a US industry body.

Analysts view the coordinated warnings as a significant escalation in the trade war and China’s export ban on critical minerals as a major retaliatory measure.

Chinese semiconductor firms, including Naura Technology Group, stated that their inclusion in the US Department of Commerce’s Entity List will have minimal impact due to their focus on domestic markets, supply chain control, and the use of domestically sourced or alternative components.

The post China and US toughen trade controls appeared first on Focus - China Britain Business Council.

2024 started with a surprise for the automotive industry as Chinese manufacturer BYD announced that it sold more battery electric vehicles (BEVs) (526,409) than Elon Musk’s Tesla (484, 507) in Q4 of 2023. This is the first time that sales by a Chinese company have outpaced the US titan.

BYD (short for ‘Build Your Dreams’) was founded in 1995 with an initial focus on rechargeable batteries. It expanded into automotive after buying a Shaanxi-based car company in 2003, using its battery experience and supply chains to pivot to electric vehicles. It sold over 3 million EVs in 2023 (including both hybrid and battery-only models), an increase of 62% over 2022. Its popular models include the best-selling Qin Plus, a compact car that retails for between RMB 99,800 and 176,800 (£11,065-19,602), the Dolphin hatchback, which retails for between RMB 116,800 and 139,800 (£12,949-15,497), and the premium Yangwang SUV.

Technically, Tesla still sold more BEVs across the whole of 2023 (1.81 million vs. BYD’s 1.57 million), and it remains the world’s most valuable car maker, but as Sino Auto Insights noted, “symbolically an important line has been crossed”. Tesla’s innovative approach, high-performance vehicles and strong branding (driven, in part, by the inescapable figure of Elon Musk) have contributed to its dominant position, but its higher price point has made it less accessible to a broader market segment, an area where BYD has gained a competitive edge.

This edge over other Chinese brands and, increasingly, international brands, has been sharpened by a number of external and internal factors.

Like all Chinese EV companies, BYD has benefitted from extensive Chinese government subsidies over the past few decades. The government has been subsidising producers of EVs for public transport, taxis and the consumer market since 2009. More than RMB 200 billion (£22.14 billion) was spent on EV subsidies and tax breaks in China over the 2009-2022 period. Moreover, EV consumers in China have received purchase subsidies from the government for a number of years.

China also has a very strong position in the supply chains for the critical materials used to make EV batteries, especially rare earths. At present, China accounts for 85% of the world’s rare earth processing and 92% of rare earth magnet production.

In terms of internal factors, BYD has also obviously benefitted from its background as a battery manufacturer, which has given it a head start in terms of technology and access to materials. By keeping battery production in-house, it can also achieve significant cost savings.

The big threat posed by BYD’s recent success is increased competition for established automotive brands.

Western markets have largely taken a protectionist stance in response to the massive growth of China’s EV sector. In September 2023, the European Commission launched an investigation into whether to impose higher tariffs on Chinese BEVs (the standard EU tariff on imported vehicles is 10%). The US currently imposes 25% tariffs on Chinese automobiles, and the Biden administration is reportedly considering upping this levy. Chinese automakers could get around this by setting up factories in Europe or in Southeast Asian countries.

Nevertheless, some commentators suggest that BYD and Tesla are so far ahead of the field that other companies are already struggling to compete. Indeed, their growth is showing that brand recognition or company history are not predictors of success in the EV market. Future growth will come down to things like AI integration and battery technology, rather than just the cars themselves, giving Silicon Valley and fast-moving Chinese companies a leg-up over traditional car manufacturers.

Now the question for BYD will be whether it can translate its current sales figures, most of which are concentrated in the Chinese market, into global success. For Tesla and other EV manufacturers, the rise of BYD serves as a call to innovate in an increasingly competitive market, innovation that could have a positive knock-on effect in other areas. Ultimately, getting more EVs of any brand on the road is an important step towards giving more people more access to sustainable transportation options.

The post How a Chinese EV brand overtook Tesla appeared first on Focus - China Britain Business Council.